Jinso
Demo
Talk to Us (opens in a new tab)

Institutional overview

Follow learning outcomes, compare them with your targets, and understand the evidence behind the numbers.

August–October 2026

Fictional institutional data
Assessed learners
247
Each assessed against four outcomes
Courses
4
A2 through C1
Outcome checks met
75%
739 of 988 learner–outcome checks
Outcomes below target
3 of 4
Against institutional benchmarks

What Jinso noticed

Spoken Interaction has the largest gap: 168 of 247 learners (68%) met the criterion, 12 percentage points below the 80% target. This identifies an evidence gap; it does not establish its cause.

Learning outcomes

Attainment is the share of assessed learners who met each outcome’s criterion. Changes are percentage points against the previous comparable period.
OutcomeEvidenceAttainmentTargetGapChange
Spoken Interaction168 / 24768%80%-12 pp+6 pp
Grammatical Control200 / 24781%78%+3 pp+4 pp
Written Production183 / 24774%78%-4 pp+4 pp
Listening Comprehension188 / 24776%82%-6 pp+4 pp

Attainment against targets

Each outcome uses the same assessed cohort for this period.

Change over time

Current attainment compared with the previous comparable reporting period.
Spoken Interaction62% → 68%
Grammatical Control77% → 81%
Written Production70% → 74%
Listening Comprehension72% → 76%

Course comparison

Open a course to inspect its criteria, sample assessment evidence, and outcome gaps.

All figures and assessment examples are fictional. Attainment describes assessed evidence, not general engagement or a CEFR certification. CEFR descriptions are illustrative paraphrases; course-specific assessment criteria determine attainment.